Letters Relating to Alligator’s Construction & Deployment

The following letters come from the National Archives Record Group 71, which were photographed by Jim Christley at the Submarine Force Museum Library and transcribed by Chuck Veit. There are a number of other letters in this file, all of which will be added as they are transcribed.

2.
Brutus de Villeroi proposals regarding his "sub-marine propeller," 7 July 1861

The owners of the Villeroi Sub-marine Propeller having proposed to dispose of this new arm to the Government of the United States respectfully submit the following proposition:

They will sell the said invention with all the specifications, plans, drawings, and secrets pertaining thereto, and the boat already constructed for salvage purposes, with all the apparatus connected  therewith for a sum of money to be hereafter agreed upon.

Mr Villeroi would offer his services to superintend the construction of the boat, drill the crew, and conduct in person the sub-marine operations.

Should the first proposition made by the owners of the Villeroi sub-marine propeller not meet with approval by the Government of the united States, they respectfully offer to substitute the following.

Proposition No. 3:

They would agree to superintend the construction of an iron sub-marine propeller for hostile operations, not to exceed in cost fourteen thousand dollars, and to be completed in forty days after the contract; (the Government to pay for the work as executed), and to dispose of said invention with all the plans, specifications, secrets, etc. pertaining thereto for a sum of money to be hereafter agreed upon, contingent upon the success of aid vessel, the money to be paid as soon as the boat shall be satisfactorily tested by a commission appointed by the Government.

As it would be necessary to the Government to have the boat already built (the same reported upon by a Commission of Officers at the Philad’a Navy Yard July 7th 1861) as a school of instruction to drill a crew while constructing another upon a larger scale for war purposes, the owners would expect the Government to take the same at cost.

Should the first and second propositions respectfully submitted to the Government of the United States by the owners of the Villeroi sub-marine propeller be rejected, they would agree to contract to perform a specific undertaking.

They will contract to blow up one or more vessels of war at the Norfolk Navy Yard for a sum equivalent to the damage inflicted upon the enemy, to be paid them on the destruction of the property.

3.
From Commander Henry Hoff, et al, evaluating the propeller,  7 July 1861

 

Navy Yard Phila.

July 7th 1861

Sir,

In obedience to your order of May 3oth  1861, the Diving Machine of Mr De Villeroi being reported ready for inspection, we proceeded to Delanco, New jersey to examine it, and have the honor to make the following report:

The submarine propeller submitted to our inspection consists of an iron cylinder, cone shaped at the two extremities, about thirty feet in length, by four feet at its greatest diameter. It is propelled by means of a screw in the stern, with two pinions, one on either side, resembling somewhat a whale in external form and appearance. Light is communicated to the interior by means of glass bulls eyes on the back, thirty six in number. An ellipsoidal section eight inches in height, opening and closing at will, affords entrance and exit to a crew of from six to  twelve men, according to the speed required. A corresponding section at the bottom of the boat admits the egress of the divers, who breathing by means of tubes attached to the boat, are enabled to perform submarine operations, such as raising sunken cargoes and attaching torpedoes to the bottoms of hostile vessels. An artificial atmosphere perfectly respirable by the men is generated by the inventor, by a chemical process, so that the submerged boat executes its maneuvers without any connection to the surface. Its entire apparatus is contained in the interior and invisible from the outside.

In justice to Mr De Villeroi we should state that the boat in question was constructed for salvage purposes and not for war uses (for the latter, he proposes if his services are accepted by the Government, to construct another on a larger scale, whose greater capacity would afford additional facilities for the maneuvers of the men, while it would also be provided with a greatly increased power of propulsion, so that in the experiment we have considered the machine employed simply as a model to demonstrate the principles to be established by the inventor.

From the experiments we have witnessed, corroborated by those made previously, we consider that Mr De Villeroi has demonstrated the following principles:

1st – The ability to remain submerged for a length of time without communication with the surface or external atmosphere, and without the least fatigue or exhaustion to the men.

2nd – That of sinking and raising his boat at pleasure six [?] immersions and emersions.

3rd – Ability of the men to leave and return to the boat while under water.

4th – Ability of a man leaving the boat to live for a length of time under water, breathing by means of a tube connected with the boat.

With regard to locomotion, the commission cannot form any decided opinion, but are under … [missing page]

The examination of the telescope called for in your order has not been made, [it] not having been brought to our notice by the inventor.

 

Very Respectfully,

Your Obedient Servant

Signed:

Henry K. Hoff, Commander

Charles Steadman, Commander

Robert Danby, Chief Engineer

 

Capt. S. F. Dupont

Commanding U.S. Naval Station

Philadelphia

5.
Brutus de Villeroi to President Lincoln, 8 March 1861

Philadelphia, March 8, 1861

To the President of the United States Abraham Lincoln

 

Excellency,

I have had the honor to remit a letter to you by Mrs Villeroi, my wife, a letter containing the proposition and description of a new maritime weapon, under the title, Submarine navigation.

After the different experiments required by the commission, named by Commodore Dupont, the reports having been satisfactory, the Navy Department ordered the construction of a propeller, according to my system on a large scale, nominating me chief engineer and superintendent of the construction.

Now the propeller is finished and ready to go on an expedition. The crew consists of 20 select Frenchmen whom I am to command in person.

My nomination as officer, with a salary of 2000 dollars a year, has been announced tome in a letter from the first of November last, signed by Commodore Joseph Smith for the secretary. But as I have not yet received that commission as officer, commander of the propeller, I should be happy to receive it from the hands of Your Excellency as having received the first proposition of my services for the national cause when worthy representatives …

 

… properly equipped, it becomes an easy matter to reconnoiter the enemy’s coast, to land men, ammunition, etc., at any given point, to enter harbors, to keep up intelligences [and] to carry explosive bombs under the very keels of vessels [--all] that without being seen. With a few such boats, manned [each] one by about a dozen men, the most formidable fleet could be annihilated in a short time. The one that [we] have experimented with is thirty-two feet in length, is built of iron, and is furnished with a screw propeller. It can be made to go on the surface of the water [and] at any depth almost—below and without any communication whatever with the external atmosphere. When under water, the men can go out of the boat to perform any work, to remove any object from the bottom, etc., and come in again without the least difficulty (see the relation in the North American and United States Gazette hereinclosed).

After this communication, Sir, should you [find] my services to be profitable to the grand cause of [the] Union, I could place myself at your disposal [also] my boat and a well practiced crew. And [should] several such boats be deemed necessary, I could have them promptly built and [their] respective crews could be made to practice . . .

 

… I have the honor to be with distinguished consideration, Your Excellency’s

Most Obedient Servant,

De Villeroi, civil engineer

1325 Pine Street

6.
Brutus de Villeroi to Gideon Welles, Secretary of the Navy, 26 September 1861

 

Philadelphia, 26th Sept 1861

Hon. Gideon Welles, Secretary of the Navy

Washington

 

Sir,

Some time since two reports were made to the Navy Department relative to a proposition I had made tendering my services to the Government of the united States. They were submitted by a Commission of Officers attached to the Navy Yard at Philadelphia appointed by Capt. Dupont.

One of those reports referred to my plan of submarine navigation and the other to a telescope so constructed as to show the distance from one point to another (whether accessible or not) without the necessity of any calculation or actual measurement whatever.

The experiments having proved satisfactory to the Commission under whose inspection they were made, I am desirous to know the result of their reports, and therefore beg leave to request, Sir, that you will come the favor to cause me to be informed of what conclusion the Government has come to in regard to the offer of my services.

 

I have the honor to be

Sir,

Your obedient servant

De Villeroi, civil engineer

1325 Pine Street, Philadelphia

7.
Commodore Joseph Smith, Chief of Bureau of Yards & Docks to Gideon Welles, 16 October 1861

 

Bureau of Yards & Docks

16th Oct. 1861

 

Honorable Gideon Welles

Secretary of the Navy

 

Sir,

I have the honor to acknowledge the reference to this Bureau of the report of a Board of Officers of whom Captain Hoff of the Navy was the senior, on the plan and performance of a submarine apparatus by Mr De Villeroi, and beg to submit the following remarks.

I have given the report a cursory examination and find that some of the features of this invention have been used by Professor Ryerson of New York, but to what extent I am unable to say. Mr De Villeroi supplies an atmosphere by chemical process, but the means are not stated, nor the mode of raising and lowering the vessel in the water at the will of the operator.

The experiment appears to have been quite satisfactory to the Board, but in my opinion the trial was made on too small a scale to test the efficiency of such a vessel for war purposes.

For many years the ingenuity of man has been taxed to invent means of destroying an enemy’s vessels by attaching explosive machines to their bottoms, but such means have not, to my knowledge, ever yet proved successful. There is a difficulty of holding on whilst attaching the instrument of destruction to the vessel, when the operators cannot touch the bottom.

I infer that a vessel could be constructed upon the proposed plan, which would enable those trained to the work to move at pleasure under water at a slow rate of speed, provided the current be not too great, and the compass be properly adjusted to the interior of the iron vessel.

If the boat proposed by the inventor can be propelled at the rate of three miles per hour, and the persons working it can detach themselves from it and operate outside, returning to it in safety, the invention might prove useful against vessels in an enemy’s port or in a roadstead.

To make a more extended and perfect test, a boat should be built under the direction of the inventor, the cost of which I am informed will not exceed $14,000, and men employed who are trained to work it. Such a vessel could be used for war purposes as well as for general submarine explorations.

The inventor and his friends propose to enter into contract with the Government for a given sum, to destroy the vessels in the port of Norfolk, without pay in the event of failure. This would be a safe experiment for the Government and probably the most satisfactory for both parties, provided the price to be paid is limited to the amount of damage inflicted on the enemy.

How far the Department may feel disposed to patronize this invention by a further test of its merits, or by contracting with the owners to perform certain service for a stipulated sum, is for you to decide.

The report of the Board is herewith returned.  

I have the honor to be

Very respectfully,

Your obedient servant,

Joseph Smith

8.
Joseph Smith to Brutus de Villeroi, 1 November 1861

 

Bureau of Yards & Docks

1 November 1861

 

DeVilleroi, B.

Engineer

Philadelphia

 

By order of the Secretary of the Navy you are hereby appointed and put in charge of the construction of the iron sub-marine propeller, on your plan, under the contract of this date with Mr Martin Thomas; the vessel to be built at Philadelphia; you to select the crew on terms to be approved by the Department, to work the same when completed.

Your pay will be at the rate of $2000 per annum for the time you shall be employed by the Navy Department, to be paid monthly.

You will employ only such men for the crew of the vessel as may be absolutely necessary for your purposes, and the Navy Department will furnish more men when you require them. You will please be particular in the construction of this propeller that no mistake be made and see that it be well provided, according to contract in all respects, for immediate action in the service intended, of which you have been informed.

 

Respectfully

Your obedient servant

Joseph Smith

17.
Attorney William L. Hirst to Joseph Smith, 20 December 1861

 

Rec’d 21 Dec

Phil’a Dec 20, 1861

Commodore Joseph Smith

Chief of Bureau etc.

 

Dear Sir,

In view of the threatened trouble with England, would it not be well to build four or five more of Villeroi’s submarines? The expense would be a trifle compared with possessing the  means of clearing our rivers and bays of blockaders.

Mr de Villeroi has put his invention in writing, and I have read it and sealed it up, as provided in the contract, and signed the certificate. I have no doubt of its success.  

With great respect

Yours most truly

W. L. Hirst

18.
Joseph Smith to William Hirst, 21 December 1861

 

Bureau of Yards & Docks

21 December 1861

Hirst, W. L.

Philadelphia, Penn’a

 

I have yours of the 20th inst. The Navy Dept. will not order any more of Mr de Villeroi’s submarine propellers till after the one now contracted for shall have been tried. If it performs all that the inventor sets forth, no doubt more will be required.

I presume you translated the description of Mr de Villeroi’s secrets and certified that it truly describes the invention.  

Yours Respectfully,

Joseph Smith

19.
William Hirst to Joseph Smith, 22 December 1861

 

Phil’a

Dec. 22, 1861

Commodore Joseph Smith

Chief of Bureau of Yards and Docks

 

Your communication of yesterday is rec’d.

The suggestion as to multiplying the propeller was my own. I had not seen the parties. I felt, as a citizen, that such a means of protection to our inland waters would be very effective in the contingency of a war with England.

The statement of M. de Villeroi is simple and complete. I do not recollect whether it is translated. I know that the original is in French, for I went over it carefully and minutely, and was satisfied, but I do not recollect whether a translation accompanied it, and as it is sealed up, I am unable to say.

I rec’d your telegraph this afternoon, and sent for Mr Thomas. He says the propeller is on the point of being finished; it will be done in a day or two; but he is very … on the subject of towing it by sea. He thinks it cannot be done, but that there is no risk in taking it by the way of the canal and Chesapeake Bay. I certainly think it is the most judicious mode of getting it to the point desired, unless it could be taken on board the Brooklyn.

Mr Thomas will call on you on Thursday.

The sealed package, with my certificate, are in my fire proof, ready to be forwarded when requested. They have not been out of my possession.  

Respectfully,

Your most obedient servant

W. L. Hirst

21.
de Villeroi to Joseph Smith, 29 December 1861

 

Philadelphia, December 29th 1861

 

Commodore Joseph Smith

 

Sir,

I have the honor to send you the list of the new men on my equipage.

According to your instructions I have delayed their engagement as long as possible; but I could not leave to the last day to complete their number, as the men I need are scarce and must be taken as soon as they are found. Too many persons of high standing in the present circumstances give the example of treason and insubordination, to be prudent to trust the first comers among sailors. Consequently my crew is entirely composed of French. Not because they are better than others in other respect, but I am sure of their fidelity and obedience. Moreover they learn during the construction to get familiar with the pieces, which they have to manoeuvre afterwards. And soon after the workmen have left and on Sundays they help me to prepare the work for the next day. I only want the divers, but they are difficult to find at this season. I am obliged to go to New York for that, whilst the vessel is being painted inside and outside, after variation.

As to the bounty, if you can not grant anything under that name, it is possible to pass that miserable small sum of ten dollars under the title of recruiting and travelling expenses. Reliable men of good conduct who de[v]ote themselves to an exceptional service for the national cause deserve well some little favor.

If the contractor had been willing to pay more liberally to have the work done on Sundays or in the night as it is done at present in the workshop for other kinds of work, there would have been no delay. As to me I work day and night at the plans and surveying a good execution.

 

I have the honor to be

Respectfully Yours [sic]

Very humble servant

De Villeroi

 

(Crew list from separate page:)

 

1 December

Louis Hennet

 

Louis Royal

 

Jean Panze

10 December

Alfred Delavaux

 

Emile Coblentz

 

Charles De Carpentier

 

Antoine Porte

 

Denis Paulin

20 December

George Germain

 

Francais Sioux

 

G. Baptiste Monier

 

Francais Laurent

 

Pierre Megard

67.
William Hirst to Joseph Smith, 5 May 1861

 

Phil: May 5th 1862

Commodore Jos Smith

 

My dear Sir,

I regret that you have any doubt as to the success of the Propeller. It is a sure thing. I am not sanguine, generally, but in this matter I have not the slightest doubt of success. But we must force M. deV. On, for his own sake, as well as the Government. If he will not act, without delay, do not hesitate to strike the blow. It is a thousand times more sure and safe than the Monitor was. That depended on a fight—this, on no such danger. The young Frenchman … last night is willing to go without DeV., as  is his companion and they say would do better without him, under the orders of an energetic young officer. There is no risk in the experiment, at all—I hope you will not allow an hour to be lost. I can’t understand DeV. He has been chattering with other parties, but they won’t touch him, nor will any honorable man collude with him to supplant the parties now interested, who have advanced so much money, time, and energy to befriend DeV. I would like you to write him the [changed?] kind of orders, even stronger than the last, tho’ that had the real gist in it. The Gov’t must keep this invention. DeV. Is old and if this fails, and he dies, it is gone.

You might safely write DeV. that I have all the power to settle the matter. I shall not abuse your confidence, nor use it in any way except first approved by you. But it will bring him to me and enable me to advise with effect. He always used to trust to my advice, implicitly, and I can easily restore his confidence if there is a chance.  

W. L. Hirst

73.
Joseph Smith to William Hirst, 7 May 1862

 

Bureau of Yards & Docks

May 7th 1862

Hirst, Wm L.

Attorney at Law

Philadelphia

 

Your letter of the 6th inst. has been received. I have written a letter to Mr De Villeroi, of which the enclosed is a copy.

If you cannot see him and make a satisfactory arrangement with him, the Department authorizes you to use the secret confided to you, and prepare the boat with a crew to go to Fortress Monroe as soon as possible, notifying the Department when the boat is ready to be shipped.

I enclose an order to Comm. Pendergrast to reclaim the apparatus which ahs been paid for and is the property [of the] U. States, now deposited at De Villeroi’s boarding house.

Commo. Pendergrast has been directed to order a Board of competent officers to witness the experimental trial of the boat tomorrow.  

Respectfully,

Your obedient servant,

Jos. Smith

80.
William Hirst to Joseph Smith, 12 May 1862

Rec’d 13 May

Phil’a

12 May 1862

Commodore Joseph Smith

Chief of Bureau of Yards & Docks

 

Dear Sir,

I wrote yesterday to you, on hearing the glorious Norfolk news, asking whether your instructions are still in force, and desiring a telegram if you had otherwise determined (tho’ I think not) as I proposed to enlist the crew today. I postponed that until tomorrow when I will do so at $40 per month, during your pleasure, every thing included, unless I receive your telegram.  It is necessary to do so or they will scatter. One has already shipped on a boat, a merchantman.

I would recommend the payment of the back wages of the first four who signed the original articles, as they have been constantly faithful to the boat and are indispensable. Their names are Alex Rhode, Henri and Jean Lambert, and Jean Frank.

It is necessary to have a head in place of M. DeVilleroi on the boat. Mr Wickenham, who was on the Expedition to Sebastopol to raise the sunken ships, warmly recommends Mr Samuel Eakins, who was 18 months at that submarine work and … the protect/protest c…, skill of activity there. For his fitness, he would be available right-… if you can rely on the testimony of M Wickenham. Mr Eakins was on board the boat today and expressed the most perfect confidence in its success. Mr E. is a practical electrician and perfectly experienced in submarine explosions. If you approve I will ascertain his terms.

Mr DeVilleroi is not yet heard from, and I consider that he has, for some comprehensible reason, abandoned the matter. I have acted accordingly, pursuant to your instructions.

Mr Thomas is pushing on the boat. It was tried today while Mr Eakins was on board, and propelled, mainly submerged, with 12 fins, faster than was expected of her.

The Commodore has approved the boat and I am daily in expectation of being ready for the test trial.  

Respectfully,

W. L. Hirst

81.
William Hirst to Joseph Smith, 12 May 1862

 Rec’d 13 May

Bureau of Yards & Docks

13th May 1862

Hirst, Wm L

Phil’a

 

Your letter of the 12th inst. has been received.

You will pay the four men who were first engaged and took the oath of allegiance their back wages, as you recommend.

You will engage Mr Eakins, provided De Villeroi still declines to comply with the request of the Department, and such of the crew as you may deem necessary, to be continued during the pleasure of the Government upon their taking the oath of allegiance. The pay of Mr Eakins is to be the same as that allowed to Mr De Villeroi, and the wages of the crew at a rate of $40 per month. The Propeller will remain at the yard for the present, there being nothing now for her to do.

I regret the trouble which arose between De Villeroi and the contractor, and was in hopes that you would effect a reconciliation and secure his services.

He has however only himself to reproach for his contumacy.  

Respectfully,

Jos. Smith

82.
William Hirst to Crewmen, 14 May 1862

 

This agreement in two parts entered into this thirteenth day of May AD 1862 between Alexander Rhodes, John Lambert, Joseph N. Bates, Amos W. Austin, Howard Bates, William Ross, Philip C. McCarran, Benjamin B. Claypool, and Cooper Woodington of the first part and Commodore Joseph Smith, Chief of the Bureau of Yards & Docks acting under the Navy Department of the United States of the other part, witnesseth,

 We parties of the first part agree to serve the United States as operatives in the Submarine Propeller under contract with Martin Thomas for and during the time they shall be employed by the United States at the rate of twenty four dollars per month each for … for [subsistence?] and necessary clothing for the work; and they further agree to sign the oath of allegiance to the United States as prescribed and which to the law of the United States enacted for the government of the Navy of the United States.

And the party of the second part agrees to pay them the said wages monthly, with ten dollars bounty each on signing this agreement as bounty for engaging in the perilous services of this propeller under orders of the Government placed over them.

It is further agreed that the pay of the said parties of the first part shall commence from the 12th day of May instant.

In witness whereof the said parties have hereto set their hands and  seals this day and year aforesaid.

Signed, sealed, and delivered in presence of W. L. Hirst as to parties of the first part.

 

(Listing names of crew)

Alexander Rhodes

John Lambert

Joseph N. Bates

Amos W. Austin

Howard Bates

William Ross

Philip C. McCarran

Benjamin B. Claypool

Cooper Woodington

 

(Also:)

Names of the old crew of the Submarine Propeller, with the time each served, etc., as given to me by Alexander Rhodes and Jean Lambert, May 13, 1862.

Alex Rhodes, engaged  Nov. 4, ’61, still in service, has received $15.

John Lambert,                                                                      nothing

….. Lambert,                                left 1 May                           $24

John Frank,                                 left April 20                          $50

Pachan [?]                     Dec 15, “   left April 20

Pullan                                                          

Delron                            Feb 1,              March 25

Carpentier [same as above]

Porte [same]

Poste [same]

Royer [same]

Bartian / Bartrain [same[

2 or 3 others, names not … [same[

Enuette                        Dec 1, “       left May 1

Joseph [same as above]

Emile                           Feb 1, “       left March 25

 

Reported by W. L. Hirst

86.
William Hirst to Samuel Eakins, 14 May 1862

 

Philad’a, May 14, 1862

Sam’l Eakins, Esq.

Philadelphia

 

Sir,

I am authorized by Commodore Joseph Smith, Chief of Bureau of Yards & Docks, to engage your services as superintendent of the Submarine Propeller now at the Navy Yard Phil’a, at a salary of $1500 per year payable monthly at during the pleasure of the government, on your taking the oath of allegiance prescribed by law.

You will signify to Commodore Smith your acceptance, and report to him for instructions without delay.  

Respectfully,

W. L. Hirst

88.
Samuel Eakins to Joseph Smith, 14 May 1862

Rec’d 15 May

Philadelphia , May 14th 1862

Commodore Joseph Smith

Chief of Bureau of Yards & Docks

 

Sir,

I have received a communication from Mr. Hirst to the effect that he is authorized to engage my services as Superintendent of the sub-marine propeller now at the Navy Yard Philadelphia at a salary of $1500 per year payable monthly during the pleasure of the Government, on my taking the oath of allegiance prescribed by law.

I have the pleasure of accepting herewith said appointment, and of enclosing to you the oath of allegiance duly signed and sworn.

Awaiting your instructions,  

I remain

Very respectfully

Your obedient servant,

Samuel Eakins

754 Sth 3rd Street, Philadelphia

93.
Brutus de Villeroi to Gideon Welles, 17 May 1862

Philadelphia

May 17th 1862

Honorable Gideon Welles, Secretary of the Navy

 

Sir,

I do not wish to make accrimination on the past, nor on the tribulations that I have experienced. I am devoted to the Government as much as ever, but my correspondence with your Department having always been direct, I have given the right to no one to make arrangements for me, not more to Mr Hirst than to any other.

On account of difficulties that arose between the contractor and myself, I have been discharged (for the French character this is a humiliation). The contract was broken as has been announced to me. Accordingly there is no more engineer nor contractor. But the rights of the inventor are still in question, and in respect to that I depend entirely on the equity of the Government. But things must pass direct with me. If you think my services of use for the Government, please make your conditions. I think they will be just enough to be accepted by me. Allow me only to recall to you, that 20 men have been at my expense from January 1st till April 15th, and as I have received only 21 days pay (from Dec. 10th till 31st) fro 17 men, I have spent a great deal of my own money. For this affair I have worked more for the glory than for money. My nature is not that of contractors.  

I have the honor to be

Respectfully,

Your obedient servant,

DeVilleroi

92.
Joseph Smith to Brutus de Villeroi, 19 May 1862

Bureau of Yards and Docks

May 19, 1862

M. DeVilleroi

Phila’d’a

 

I have received your letter of the 17th inst., and in reply would state that all my communications have been addressed to you direct, passing only in one or two instances through the hands of Mr. Hirst.

I called upon you to complete the boat on Government account, agreeing to pay you and your crew from the date of suspension of your pay on the 1st of January last, but you declined to receive or take any notice of the Bureau’s communication.

The Government therefore was compelled to make other arrangements for completing the boat, and to engage a commander to take charge of and operate her.

I had always considered you as a party to the contract, although you did not sign it. Your quarrel with the contractor should not interfere with your duty to the Government.

I can only regret the course you have seen proper to pursue. Some of the men whom you have engaged will be paid by the Government.

The Department has no further propositions to offer.  

Respectfully,

Your ob’d Serv’t

Joseph Smith

107.
Samuel Eakins to Joseph Smith, 31 May 1862

Rec’d 5 June

 

Philadelphia , May 31st 1862

Commodore Joseph Smith

Chief of Bureau of Docks & Yards

Washington D.C.

 

Sir,

By order of yourself communicated to me by Wm. L. Hirst, Esq., I assumed charge of the submarine propeller lying at the Navy Yard Philadelphia and reported to yourself for duty on 14th ult. I have since been diligently engaged in the duty assigned me and I now report to this date May 31st.

 1st The absence of all the air tubes and couplings necessary for connections with the air pumps and air chambers of the boat, as well as pipes and couplings belonging [to] the apparatus for distributing the air through the boat, all of which had evidently at one time been in place but could not now be found. These have all been replaced and the proper examinations made to ascertain the completeness of the other fittings. These experimentations disclosed a number of leaks and an endeavor was made for three days to make the repairs at the Navy Yard. During this time so many leaks were discovered from the air chambers around the flanges, bulkheads, and manholes as to make the return of the boat to the yard of builders (Neafie & Levy) a necessity.

2nd The want of a look out place has been supplied. For this it was [necessary] to take of[f] the upper covering of entrance to the boat and prepare patterns and castings and this the workmen are now putting in place. The covering of the entrance to the diver’s room has been altered and refitted and is now reliable. An alteration has also been made to the door of exit for the diver that will improve it and I hope may be entirely efficient and sure in its closing.

3rd The arrangement for discharge of ballast was very defective. The lever handles being entirely too short as well as being hid away among pipes for filling and discharging the water from the tanks. New levers have been made for these and they are placed in such position as to be immediately available and sure in operation.

A water pressure gauge and level have been placed in position upon the boat, water and vents (cocks) inserted in the tanks, which will insure there [sic] filling. The paddles have been overhauled and made sure of being in good working order. I have also repainted the  outside and a portion of the inside of the boat and some minor alterations have been made of the internal arrangement making the parts easier to access by the crew for working and adding to the efficiency of the boat.  

Very respectfully,

Samuel Eakins

117.
Joseph Smith to William Hirst, 5 June 1862

Bureau of Yards & Docks

June 5th 1862

Hirst, Wm L.
Philadelphia

 

Your letter of the 4th inst. with enclosures has been received.

You will use your own discretion as to paying the orders of absentees. Having receipted for the amount of their services, it remains for you to settle with the crew of the Propeller. The Bureau always requires the receipt of the party to whom it is indebted, and payment is made to the agent authorized to receive the money when he produces the receipt of the principal.

I enclose bills approved for the amount due for the past month, including the charge for your own services, which is satisfactory, as it embraces any future requirements which may be made on you. I propose to put the crew of the Propeller on the roles of the Paymaster of the Yard, and the men under regulations from the 1st instant.

After you shall have seen M. De Villeroi, you will let me know what he says, and how he seems disposed for service.

I presume from Mr Eakins’ report the vessel is now ready excepting the application of supplying her with air.  

Respectfully,

Your Obedient Servant,

Joseph Smith

118.
Brutus de Villeroi to Joseph Smith, 7 June 1862

Rec’d 9th June

Philadelphia

June 7th 1862

Commodore Joseph Smith

 

In your last letter of May 19th you announce to me that a new commander is to superintend the operations of the propeller and that my men will be paid. For this letter I thank you, but it is necessary that we should understand each other.

In granting 16 dollars a month for the board of my men, namely $3.39 a week, the Department has well understood to make a bargain with me, to avoid the embarrassment of the difference in price, the mean sum of $3.69. Thus the most simple manner to regulate this part of the account, that I have either paid or given security for, is to deposit the whole sum due from January first for board of the 20 men, whose petition I have approved. I will settle the accounts for board due to others as well as to me. The orders will be paid by your agent and the remainder will repay me for what I have advanced. The receipts will prove it.

The payment for the 21 days of December which I received in May only (see my receipt) I have kept to repay myself partly for the money that I have advanced for board and cash during four months, and for some even more. I will have to pay the balance of their accounts of the 21 days. My written orders with the sums that they have received will be equally closed by your agent. Thus all will be settled without misreckoning and confusion. Why complicate such simple things? As to the month of November all has been settled in time with the four men according to their own conditions. They have nothing to claim. I will give this note also to your agent to avoid all false claims created by malevolence.

As the Government does not admit my services, I think there will be no difficulty in returning to me the sealed packet that I have deposited with Mr Hirst, and which was not to be opened but in case of my death in the service of the Government.  

I have the honor to be,

Respectfully,

Your Obedient Servant,

De Villeroi

119.
Joseph Smith to Brutus de Villeroi, 9 June 1862

Bureau of Yards & Docks

June 9th 1862

De Villeroi, M.
Philadelphia, Pa.

 

Your letter of the 7th inst. has been received.

When the Department decided to take the boat and pay the builders, it notified you that your services were required and you were directed to go on and complete the boat. You were also informed that your pay as well as that of your crew would be allowed from the date of it suspension. You thought proper not to notice the letters—the crew of the vessel have been paid according to agreement.

As you have become responsible for the board of the crew, you must look to them and to Mr Hirst to be reimbursed. The Department made no engagement to pay for subsistence—the bargain was a stated sum in full for pay and subsistence

In not complying with its requirements the Department considers that you have been derelict to your engagements according to the stipulations of the contract to which you were a party, and feels justified in employing the invention without your aid.  

Respectfully,

Your Obedient Servant,

Joseph Smith

120.
William Hirst to Joseph Smith, 9 June 1862

 

Philadelphia

June 9th 1862

Commodore Joseph Smith

Chief of Bureau of Docks

 

Your communication [?], with pay bills enclosed was duly rec’d. I enclose the receipts of the [?] crew.

I consider it best that the absentees themselves [? ?] the receipts, as the [?] are given/gain when the [?] was [?]. I enclose the receipt of Chr. Dittman who came from New York and of D. Carpenter of Allegand who is out at Beth___. The two in the army have been written to, at Harpers Ferry, where I learn they are, with a formal receipt for their separation.

The boat was submerged three times on Saturday—the last time for 20 minutes, the others 15 minutes. Mr Eakins was perfectly satisfied she is a success. He detects some small matters to be corrected, which will take 2 or 3 days. He wishes to make to make her perfect. I have great confidence in him.

M. De Villeroi has not made his appearance. His men, I learn, have [prospects?] out for him. I have given up all hopes of seeing him, and have settled nearly all the boat bills on the [?] I could collect.

I am glad you have placed the men on the [?] May Roll. It will improve the discipline of the crew. I think Mr Eakins ought to be authorized to enlist a full crew, as room [?] on the boat is [?]. I have the most …ment confidence in her success and value to the Government.  

Respectfully,

Your Obedient Servant,

Wm Hirst

121.
Joseph Smith to William Hirst, 13 June 1862

Bureau of Docks & Yards

June 13th 1862

Hirst, Wm L.

Philadelphia

 

The submarine propeller being reported ready for service please turn her over to the Commandant of the Navy Yard, to whom I have written directing that she be sent to Fortress Monroe by the first conveyance.

The crew of the vessel will be borne on the rolls of the Paymaster of the Yard, and hereafter be paid by him.  

Respectfully,

Your Obedient Servant,

Joseph Smith

 

P.S.

The Secretary of the Navy requests that you will make such arrangements with the master of the boat as will enable him to use her as proposed.

122.
Joseph Smith to William Hirst

 

Telegram

Bureau of Yards and Docks
16 June 1862

Hirst, William L.
Philadelphia

 

A vessel was ordered on Saturday to go from Hampton Roads to Philadelphia to tow the Propeller. Let her be dispatched. Com’d Pendergrast has been ordered to send her forward immediately, and to fill the crew at Philadelphia or at Hampton Roads from the vessels.

 

Joseph Smith

123.
Joseph Smith to William Hirst, 16 June 1862